Little Update on former Royal Welsh Solider Rhys Rutledge

Here’s the latest update in the ongoing saga with Rhys Rutledge. Word’s gotten back to Rhys about my articles and TikTok videos (you can click for Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3), and, predictably, the “brilliant” strategist went running straight to his solicitor. But rather than directing his rage at me—the one holding up the mirror—he went after his soon-to-be ex-wife with claims of defamation and harassment. So let’s break down why that’s as flimsy as his public image.

**UK Defamation and Privacy Laws for Public Figures**

Let’s start with some basic UK law. Defamation laws protect reputations from false claims that could harm someone’s standing. But here’s the thing: truth is an absolute defence. And if you're a public figure—like Rhys, who leads a charity supported by the Ministry of Defence and is funded by public donations—your personal affairs are often considered "in the public's best interest" to know. That’s where privacy protection fades. You’re on social media, in the charity spotlight, and willingly sought attention, yet Rhys believes he can silence anyone who points out the grimy reality behind the scenes.

In this case, though, we’re not even dealing with false claims. Rhys’s abusive language and behaviour, especially towards his wife and his children (two of whom have severe autism/ADHD), are well-documented. And yes, the public has every right to know about it, given his involvement with an autism charity. The hypocrisy alone is astounding: here’s a man who helps with charities designed to support vulnerable individuals with autism, yet thinks nothing of demeaning his own family members with vile slurs, openly discussing placing one son in care. And the charity founder is aware of Rhys’s reputation and, apparently, couldn’t care less.

Financial Manipulation and the Legal Loophole Dance

When it comes to Rhys’s financial situation, things get even sketchier. He claims to make less than £3,000 a year in wages—so little that he provides only £45.48 a week for his three children. That’s £195.56 a month, folks! He runs his own security company, so how does he manage this miraculous poverty act? Simple: by claiming expenses in a way that reduces his taxable income and, consequently, his child maintenance payments. Standard way of avoiding Child Maintenance. So, while his children and ex-wife struggle to make ends meet, Rhys has no trouble flaunting his match-day outings or keeping multiple cars on the road.

Now here’s where things get particularly bizarre: despite his supposedly dismal income, Rhys has managed to hire a lawyer to go after Jane. Lawyers aren’t cheap, as anyone who’s ever had to seek legal advice knows. Where’s that money coming from, Rhys? And if things are that tight, why go after Jane’s house—a property she bought before your arrival on the scene? Rhys even signed a Declaration of Trust, yet here he is, claiming rights to her assets. Gold-digger vibes, anyone?

Defamation: Nice Try, Rhys

So, let’s circle back to this so-called “defamation.” The only thing I did was hit “play” and then put pen to paper, detailing domestic violence issues involving a charity spokesman who’s entangled in some questionable financial practices. Not exactly defamatory material, more like documenting a public interest story. In a recorded call between Rhys and Jane, he even admits to physically assaulting her. A defamation suit needs to show that the statements made were false and caused harm to his reputation. Sorry to say, Rhys, but with you already on record admitting these things, your reputation seems to be a self-inflicted wound.

Public Speaking Engagements and Questionable Conduct

Rhys has been paid for speaking engagements at schools, colleges, and units for children excluded from mainstream education. He's also delivered public speeches for police and probation services. Allegedly, the Scots and Irish Guards have requested him for paid speeches. One has to wonder if these organizations are aware of his personal conduct and the allegations against him.

If you’re going to be sending out cease and desist letters, maybe direct them at the one “entrepreneurial journalist” who isn’t afraid to call out your behaviour.
And no, Rhys, you didn’t avoid that non-molestation order because you’re Prince Charming.

(Written with the tiny Brain of a woman, who you cannot bully or intimidate)